Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charlotte Chavatipon vs Emma Kamper Malmkjaer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chavatipon vs Malmkjaer analysis and find out who is favored!
Charlotte Chavatipon vs Emma Kamper Malmkjaer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chavatipon 0 - 0 Malmkjaer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chavatipon has won 45.68% of points on their second serve, while Malmkjaer has won 40.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chavatipon, in recent form, has won 49.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Malmkjaer has won 61.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.34% and 41.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chavatipon has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Malmkjaer has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chavatipon has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 5/ 4), with Malmkjaer winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chavatipon has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 41/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Malmkjaer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Chavatipon has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 5/ 3), where as Malmkjaer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chavatipon has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.89 while Malmkjaer has played against players with an average rank of 142.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chavatipon has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Malmkjaer has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chavatipon has converted 46.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Malmkjaer has converted 60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
892
Rank
574
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (51-40)
Career Total W/L
48% (11-12)
63% (5-3)
YTD W/L
50% (4-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Charlotte Chavatipon vs Emma Kamper Malmkjaer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chavatipon VS Malmkjaer
Sportsbook
Offer
Chavatipon VS Malmkjaer H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 10-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charlotte Chavatipon | Emma Kamper Malmkjaer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 56% (10/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (91/82) | 53% (86/76) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151.75 | 108.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (275/437) | 69% (70/102) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (192/275) | 53% (37/70) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (74/162) | 41% (13/32) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (20/43) | 60% (9/15) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (202/485) | 51% (62/122) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Charlotte Chavatipon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Amy Zhu
Player
Charlotte Chavatipon
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Charlotte Chavatipon
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Kylie Mckenzie
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Victoria Flores
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Charlotte Chavatipon
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Kate Fakih
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Tori Kinard
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Dia Evtimova
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emma Kamper Malmkjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Emma Kamper Malmkjaer
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Kamper Malmkjaer
Player
Elizabeth Ionescu
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Chavatipon Vs Malmkjaer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chavatipon are available here and Malmkjaer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
